References
- 1
Taber A, Romagnuolo J.
Simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time increases polyp detection rate.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB80-AB81
- 2
Weiser K T, Butterly L F, Toor A. et al .
Changing colonoscopy performance to meet the quality indicator of withdrawal time:
results of a clinic-based improvement intervention.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB78
- 3
Chan M Y, Cohen H, Spiegel B M.
Does the first colonoscopy of the day yield more polyps than cases performed later?.
Gastroenterology.
2008;
134
A37
- 4
Zauber A G, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Wilschut J. et al .
Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopy is the most likely screening strategy
to offset escalating treatment costs.
Gastroenterology.
2008;
134
A152
- 5
Bokemeyer B, Rambow A, Hüppe D. et al .
Screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer prevention– results from a German online
registry on 269 000 cases.
Gastroenterology.
2008;
134
A162
- 6
Gellad Z F, Almirall D, Provenzale D. et al .
Time from positive screening fecal occult blood test to colonoscopy and risk of neoplasia.
Gastroenterology.
2008;
134
A151
- 7
Leung W K, Lau J Y, Suen B. et al .
Colonoscopic screening at 5-year after initial examination in average risk subjects:
a prospective study.
Gastroenterology.
2008;
134
A88
- 8
Martinez M E, Schatzkin A, Baron J A. et al .
Advanced colorectal neoplasia following polypectomy: a pooled analysis.
Gastroenterology.
2008;
134
A632
- 9
Robertson D J, Lieberman D A, Winawer S J. et al .
Interval cancer after total colonoscopy: results from a pooled analysis of eight studies.
Gastroenterology.
2008;
134
A111
- 10
Ho S B, Krinsky M L.
Quality polyp resection in colonoscopy: are we achieving polyp clearance?.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB79-AB80
- 11
Gross S A, Buchner A M, Cangemi J R. et al .
A prospective randomized back-to-back trial comparing narrow band imaging to conventional
colonoscopy for adenoma detection.
Gastroenterology.
2008;
134
A47
- 12
Adler A, Yenerim T, Aschenbeck J. et al .
Narrow band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for screening colonoscopy in a
private practice setting–a large prospective randomized trial.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB100-AB101
- 13
Rogart J N, Siddiqui U D, Jain D. et al .
Narrow band imaging without high magnification to differentiate polyps during real-time
colonoscopy: improvement with experience.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB101
- 14
Mayinger B, Neumann F, Kastner C L. et al .
Early detection of pre-malignant conditions in the colon by fluorescence endoscopy
using local sensitization with hexaminolevulinate (Hal).
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB102
- 15
Pellise M, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Cardenas A. et al .
Clinical impact of wide-angle, high-resolution endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal
neoplasia in a non-selected population: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB101
- 16
Waye J D, Heigh R I, Fleischer D E. et al .
A prospective efficacy evaluation of the third eye retroscope auxiliary endoscopy
system.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB101-AB102
- 17
Benson M E, Dureja P, Gopal D V. et al .
A comparison of overall adenoma detection and recovery rate of optical colonoscopy
and CT colonography.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB89
- 18
Rex D K, Overhiser A, Chen S.
American College of Radiology (ACR) recommendations for CT colonography (CTC) interpretation:
implications for resection of high risk adenoma findings.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB105-AB106
- 19
Kessler W A, Klein R W, Wielage R C. et al .
Cost savings of removing diminutive polyps without histologic assessment.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB105
- 20
Gellad Z F.
Colonoscopy withdrawal time and risk of neoplasia on follow-up colonoscopy: results
from VA Cooperative Study Program 380.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB80
- 21
Lin O.
The effect of periodic monitoring on screening colonoscopy withdrawal times, polyp
detection rates and patient satisfaction scores.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB81
- 22
Sinn D H.
Documentation of withdrawal time improves adenoma detection during colonoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB81
- 23
Cury M S.
Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time 7 minutes on polyp
detection.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB304
- 24
Benson M E.
Factors that influence colonoscopic technique and adenoma detection rates at an academic
gastroenterology unit.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB294-AB295
- 25
Francis G A.
Time of day as a risk factor for incomplete colonoscopy: an Australian tertiary referral
hospital experience.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB287
- 26
El-Serag H B.
Determinants and effect of lag time before colorectal cancer diagnosis.
Gastroenterology.
2008;
134
A152
- 27
Fisher D A.
Time to diagnosis of colorectal cancer in the VA system.
Gastroenterology.
2008;
134
A152
- 28
Yen R.
Ethnic differences in findings on screening colonoscopy.
Gastroenterology.
2008;
134
A180
- 29
Kerman D.
A prospective study of the prevalence of colorectal adenomas in Hispanic immigrants
referred for screening colonoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB313-AB314
- 30
Weed M T.
Medicaid patients with colorectal cancer are rarely diagnosed by screening colonoscopy.
Gastroenterology.
2008;
134
A182
- 31
Abdelsayed G.
Who are we missing in colorectal cancer screening?.
Gastroenterology.
2008;
134
A160
- 32
Rathgaber S W.
Repeat colonoscopy guideline adherence following screening and surveillance exams
in a community gastroenterology practice?.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB236-AB237
- 33
Laiyemo A O.
The continued follow up study of the Polyp Prevention Trial: a prospective study of
utilization and yield of surveillance colonoscopy.
Gastroenterology.
2008;
134
A111
- 34
Leung K.
The Polyp Prevention Trial Continued Follow-Up Study (PPT-CFS): ongoing colorectal
cancer risk despite surveillance colonoscopy.
Gastroenterology.
2008;
134
A114
- 35
Krinsky M L.
Dysplasia detection of colonic polyps and polypectomy sites using an Optical Biopsy™
system.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB309
- 36
Inoue T.
Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging
system in the detection of neoplastic colonic polyps: a randomized, controlled trial.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB302-AB303
- 37
Suzuki H.
Novel optical imaging techniques for diagnosis of colorectal adenoma–a prospective
case study on detection of colorectal adenomas using AFI compared with NBI.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB185-AB186
- 38
Wada Y.
The diagnosis of colorectal lesions with magnifying narrow band imaging (NBI) system.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB311-AB312
- 39
Reese G E.
Diagnostic Precision of narrow band imaging (NBI) versus chromoendoscopy for lesion
characterization at colonoscopy: a meta analysis.
Gastroenterology.
2008;
134
A192
- 40
Stipho S.
The clinical utility of high definition magnification endoscopy with and without narrow
band imaging for detection of colonic neoplasia.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB130
- 41
Ko , BM .
Comparison with narrow band imaging(NBI) magnification and histology finding in colorectal
neoplasms.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB126
- 42
Patel K.
The intra and inter observer variability of narrow band imaging to differentiate hyperplastic
versus adenomatous polyps.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB136
- 43
Fukuzawa M.
Can magnification narrow-band imaging (NBI) colonoscopy determine invasion depth of
early colorectal cancer?–A prospective study.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB122-AB123
- 44
Hiraga Y.
Clinical usefulness of NBI magnification in routine colonoscopic examination.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB136
- 45
Sasajima K.
Efficacy of narrow band imaging magnification for microvessel pattern of colorectal
lesions.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB125
- 46
Suzuki H.
Novel optical imaging techniques for diagnosis of colorectal adenoma–a prospective
case study on detection of colorectal adenomas using AFI compared with NBI.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB308-AB309
- 47
Aihara H.
Clinical significance of image-enhanced endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging (AFI)
observations in differentiation between colonic neoplastic lesions and non-neoplastic
lesions.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB309
- 48
Haringsma J.
Wide-angle colonoscopy significantly improves polyp detection rate.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB310
- 49
Randolph A C.
Polyp detection rates do increase with the use of high definition, wide-angle colonoscopes.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB310
- 50
Pohl J.
A prospective randomized multicenter study on the Fujinon Intelligent Colour Enhancement
(FICE) system versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy:
what is the impact of novel optical imaging techniques on polyp detection rates?.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB101
- 51
Burgos H.
Correlation of Fujinon FICE endoscopic imaging and histopathological findings in colorectal
adenomas.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB133
- 52
Bianchi L K.
High-definition endoscopy improves adenoma detection.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB305-AB306
- 53
Buchner A M.
Does the use of high definition white light colonoscopy lead to higher adenoma detection
rates compared to standard definition white light colonoscopy? An effectiveness study
in 1225 patients.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB130
- 54
Hoffman A.
High definition colonoscopy (HD +) with I-Scan function allows to recognize and characterize
flat neoplastic changes as precisely as chromoendoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
AB125
- 55
Kupfer A.
Factors associated with advanced histology in small colonic polyps in a racially diverse
population.
Gastroenterology.
2008;
134
A183
- 56
Chaves D M, Nakao F S, Sugai B M. et al .
Prevalence of low and high grade diminutive adenomas in patients submitted to routine
colonoscopy.
Gastroenterology.
2008;
134
A186
M. E. van LeerdamMD, PhD
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Erasmus MC University Medical Center
P.O. Box 2040
3000 CA, Rotterdam
The Netherlands
Fax: +31-10-7034682
Email: m.vanleerdam@erasmusmc.nl
